"Fundamental ontology" appeared as a result of Heidegger's decision to re-interpret phenomenology, as developed earlier by his mentor Edmund Husserl, and which relied on a set of basic ontological categories. Heidegger tries to rectify ontic philosophy by focusing instead on the meaning of being-or what he called "fundamental ontology." This "ontological inquiry" is required to understand the basis of the sciences, according to "Being and Time" (1927). According to Richard Rorty, Heidegger envisioned no "hidden power of Being" as an ultimate entity. This has led to the mistake of understanding being as such as a kind of ultimate entity, for example as idea, energeia, substantia, actualitas or will to power. He accuses the Western philosophical tradition of incorrectly focusing on the "ontic"-and thus forgetful of this distinction. In 1937's " Contributions to Philosophy" Heidegger described it as " the essence of Dasein." This "ontological difference" is central to Heidegger's philosophy.
Heidegger's "fundamental ontology" is fundamental relative to traditional ontology in that it concerns "what any understanding of entities necessarily presupposes, namely, our understanding of that in virtue of which entities are entities," Carman writes. Traditional ontology asks "Why is there anything?" whereas Heidegger's "Fundamental Ontology" asks "What does it mean for something to be?," writes Taylor Carman (2003). He says this "ontological inquiry" is required to understand the basis of the sciences. The history of ontology in Western philosophy is, in Heidegger's terms, ontical, whereas ontology ought to designate fundamental ontology. He labeled this the "Ontological Difference." It is from this distinction that he developed the concept of "Fundamental Ontology." In Being and Time, the philosopher Martin Heidegger made the distinction between ontical and ontological, or between beings and " being" as such. ( Learn how and when to remove this template message) JSTOR ( December 2020) ( Learn how and when to remove this template message).Please improve this article by adding secondary or tertiary sources.įind sources: "Fundamental ontology" – news This article relies excessively on references to primary sources.
0 kommentar(er)
